Skip to content
See the radar
OJOPY · Early real-estate radar and intelligence · Paraguay

Real-estate intelligence for investing in Paraguay.

Before you commit to a property in Paraguay, we show you what the public records say: who's behind it, what's left to verify, how the price compares, and what your notary should flag.

We detect new-project signals in MADES/SIAM and check, case by case, whether they already had commercial visibility.

The edge

Know what was on record before accepting the sales story.

An environmental signal may precede marketing, coincide with it, or arrive later. OJOPY cross-checks dates and sources to distinguish those scenarios, show what was documented, and avoid turning a public trace into an investment promise.

The timing edge is never assumed: it only exists when a dated source demonstrates it. If the project was already public or matching cannot confirm it, we say that too.

Real proof · no cherry-picking

Three outcomes, not a perfect demo

Earlier signal

Insignia 8

Environmental source: 23 Jun 2025. Dated listing: 30 Aug 2025. Verifiable window: 68 days against that listing.

Already public

Venire Las Lomas

Commercial article: 25 Sep 2023. Environmental source: 12 Aug 2025. There is no documentary first-look here.

Incomplete match

Aura Japandi

The feed attributed no portal date, but a dated listing existed. Not located does not prove absence.

OJOPY's first snapshot for the first two cases is dated 22 June 2026; Aura had no stored score history. This is retrospective validation, not contemporaneous detection in 2025. Read the audited Evidence Brief →

  • Early signal in MADES
  • Document coverage: low, medium, or high
  • Risk pressure: low, medium, high, or critical
  • Timing: new, early, public, or mature
  • Ordinal index as a secondary aid
  • Traceable source (MADES)
  • Zone location
  • Why it surfaces now
  • What's left to verify
  • Estimated yield (when zone data exists)
  • Zone comparables (when available)
Ordinal index

A ranking aid, not a probability

Read document coverage, risk pressure, and timing first. The S–F letter remains a secondary summary and is always limited by available data.
S

Maximum-strength signal: high index and broad public-source coverage.

A

Strong signal, with nearly the full data picture in place.

B

Solid case: high score, readable pricing, and good data coverage.

C

Moderate signal: reasonable evidence and several dimensions covered.

D

Basic signal, still with partial data coverage.

F

Red flags that outweigh the upside: a critical risk detected or very high risk pressure (≥75/100). We don't hide it — we label it.

How we score it, in full, at Methodology →

Evidence report · Evidence Brief

What you verify before committing

Preliminary work based on public sources: it does not replace legal due diligence by your lawyer or notary.

Project and developer identity

Who's behind it and what it's actually called, according to public records.

The dimensions the engine scores

Every relevant dimension with its 0-100 score and the factors behind it.

Traceable sources

Every data point links to its public source — you can verify it yourself.

Red flags

What doesn't add up in the public record and deserves a closer look.

Missing data

The gaps: what we expected to find and still hasn't surfaced.

Concrete questions

To bring to the seller, lawyer, or notary — word for word.

Price per m² vs. zone

How it stacks up against zone comparables, when nearby comparables exist.

Project tracking

Follow it in your collection and see it flagged when its evidence changes.

Who it's for

For investors who refuse to buy the seller's story

  • You want to find early public signals and know whether the project is already being marketed.
  • You'd rather read the public evidence yourself, ahead of everyone else.
  • You're comparing multiple projects and need a consistent scoring framework.
  • You're buying from outside Paraguay and can't visit in person.
  • You don't know the developer or their visible track record.
  • You want to know what's left to verify before committing capital.
How it works

From the public environmental registry to a signal in your radar

Nothing to upload. You don't bring the project — we detect it and put it in front of you.
In 30 seconds: from signal to card.
01

We detect in MADES

A project enters our radar the moment it appears in the public environmental registry (MADES/SIAM).

02

We cross-reference sources

Portals, geo, rental and census data — all public, all traceable.

03

We score with the engine

The signal score and its dimensions come from our proprietary model.

04

We publish the signal

The signal goes into the radar anonymized, with score, grade, and evidence.

05

You unlock the report

You open its evidence report: dimensions, sources, red flags, and questions.

06

You track the project

Add it to your collection and see changes flagged in its public evidence.

Access

Explore free. Unlock what matters to you.

The radar is free; unlock a card for US$24, or activate the Research pass (US$49/mo · US$490/yr) for the full catalog and new signals.
Full radar

Filter all early signals (MADES) by zone, grade, and evidence — construction and land in one view.

OJOPY is not a broker, does not sell properties, and does not replace your lawyer or notary. It doesn't guarantee returns or eliminate risk: it reduces information asymmetry by cross-referencing public sources and documenting each one. The radar verdict is an algorithmic read on public data — every data point links to its source — never a buy recommendation. Investment decisions are yours alone.

The radar is free; unlock the evidence when you need it.